Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator
Honestly, it depends on how much you enjoy feeling like you're eavesdropping on a conversation in a museum. If you’re a fan of the dramatic flair found in The Winchester Woman, you might find something to love here. For everyone else, it’s a bit of a slog.
The film starts with this intense, heavy-handed energy that almost knocks you over. You can tell they *really* wanted this to be a serious statement on the institution of marriage. Instead, it’s mostly people sighing loudly and pacing across patterned rugs.
There is a scene near the middle where a character just sits at a desk for what feels like a literal eternity. No dialogue, just staring at a letter. I think the camera lens might have actually gotten dusty while they were filming it. It’s weirdly hypnotic, though, in a way that makes you wonder if they just forgot to yell 'cut.'
The dialogue is thick. It’s not just talking; it’s *performing* talking. Every line feels like it was delivered with a megaphone, even when they’re supposed to be whispering secrets. It reminded me a bit of the stuffiness in Beau Brummel, just with more emotional baggage and less fancy suits.
It’s not a masterpiece, but it’s a time capsule. There’s something strangely grounding about seeing these people pretend that their small, internal dramas are the center of the universe. It’s a bit like watching a vintage commercial for a product that doesn't exist anymore. 🕰️
I wouldn't call it a 'must-watch' unless you're deep into the weeds of mid-century regional cinema. But if you’re looking to kill a rainy afternoon with something that refuses to be modern, you could do worse. Just don't expect it to change your life or anything.

Year
1935
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.