8/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 8/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Shirley Temple: Early Years (Volume 1) remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Alright, so you’ve got Shirley Temple: Early Years (Volume 1). Is it worth checking out today? If you’re a **massive** Shirley Temple fan, or just someone who loves old Hollywood history, absolutely. This is pure archival stuff, a real peek behind the curtain.
For everyone else, the casual movie watcher? Maybe not. You’ll probably find it a bit slow, a little rough around the edges, and honestly, not what you expect if you're thinking of her classic features. It’s for the curious, not necessarily for a Friday night popcorn flick.
What you get here is a bunch of her really early short films, some from the 'Baby Burlesk' series. It's almost jarring to see her *not* in those perfect ringlets, or singing 'On the Good Ship Lollipop'.
You can tell, even in these super early bits, that there was just **something** about her. Like, in one of the shorts, there’s this moment where she just *looks* at the camera, and it’s not a trained look. It’s just this natural sparkle. Hard to fake that, even for a kid.
A lot of these shorts, they’re pretty rudimentary, production-wise. The sound can be a bit dodgy, the sets are minimal. It feels like watching old home movies, almost, if your home movies had future stars in them.
There's this one scene, I forget which short exactly, but she’s just kinda wandering around while adults are doing their thing. And even then, she just *commands* your eye. She’s not doing much, but she’s the most interesting thing happening on screen. It’s crazy, really, to see that raw, unpolished talent.
Sometimes the humor in these burlesks, it’s a little… *odd* by today’s standards. Like, grown-up jokes coming out of kids' mouths. It feels a bit uncomfortable at times, to be honest. But it’s a product of its era, I guess.
You can really see the groundwork being laid, though. The way she moves, the way she reacts. It's like watching a caterpillar before it becomes a butterfly. Not that she was ever a caterpillar, she was always cute, but you know what I mean. Her future stardom, it’s all *there*, in embryo form.
It’s also neat to catch glimpses of other actors who were just starting out or were bit players then. Like, you see Frank Coghlan Jr. in a few frames. Everyone had to start somewhere, right? These shorts were often a testing ground.
The pacing, for sure, is not what we're used to now. Some scenes just linger, maybe a few seconds too long, or cut away too fast. It's not always smooth. But that’s part of the charm, kinda.
There's a particular bit where she's trying to dance, and she's not perfectly in sync, but the effort, the sheer *joy* on her face? That’s what sticks with you. It’s not about perfection here; it’s about personality.
You can almost feel the filmmakers trying to figure out what works. They probably didn't know they had a goldmine on their hands. Just another cute kid, right?
So, yeah. If you’re digging for the roots of a legend, this volume is essential. It’s not a movie you’ll probably revisit a lot, but for that first watch, it’s pretty special. You get to witness history in the making. And that’s a pretty cool thing. 🎥

IMDb —
1931
Community
Log in to comment.