6.9/10
Archivist John
Senior Editor

A definitive 6.9/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. St Kilda: Britain's Loneliest Isle remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
You should watch this if you ever feel like the modern world is too loud. It is also great for people who like looking at old maps and wondering what happened to the people who lived there.
If you need a plot or dialogue, stay away. This is just a camera on a boat and some very windy cliffs.
It starts in Glasgow. You see the big ships and the smoke and people in flat caps looking very busy.
Then the boat heads out. It feels like the movie is literally leaving civilization behind in real time.
The footage gets a bit shaky here. I guess the Atlantic wasn't very kind to the cameraman that day.
I found myself staring at the hats. Everyone in the 1920s had such specific hats, even on a boat in a gale. 🎩
When they get to St Kilda, it doesn't look real. It looks like a giant tooth sticking out of the ocean.
There are no trees. Just grass and rocks and thousands of birds.
The film shows the people who lived there. They look small against the landscape.
There is this one shot of a man climbing a cliff with just a rope. It’s terrifying because you know there’s no stunt double or green screen. 🧗♂️
He’s just swinging there to catch birds for food. It made my stomach do a weird little drop.
I’ve seen mountain films like Der Berg des Schicksals where the climbing is all dramatic and staged. This feels much scarier because it's just a Tuesday for this guy.
The kids in the movie look very serious. They are dressed in thick wool and just stare at the lens like it's an alien spacecraft.
I kept thinking about how they were all evacuated just a few years after this was filmed. It makes the whole thing feel like a ghost story happening in the past.
The sheep are interesting too. They are these tiny, primitive-looking things called Soay sheep.
There’s a bit where they are herding them. It looks like total chaos, honestly.
The intertitles—the text on the screen—are very polite. They explain things in a way that feels like a school teacher talking to you.
One says something about the islanders being very religious. Then you see them walking to a tiny stone church looking very stiff.
The quality of the film is rough. There are scratches and white spots everywhere.
Usually, that bothers me, but here it works. It feels like you are looking through a dusty window into 1928.
I noticed a dog in one scene just hanging out by a stone wall. It’s a small thing, but it made the place feel more like a home and less like a museum piece. 🐶
The movie doesn't really have an ending. The boat just leaves and the island gets smaller and smaller.
It’s a bit sad, really. You’re watching a way of life that had lasted for centuries just... flicker out.
It reminds me a bit of the quietness in Annie Laurie, but without the Hollywood polish. This is raw.
I wouldn't call it a masterpiece of cinematography. Some of the framing is pretty bad and the lighting is whatever the sun decided to do that hour.
But it’s honest. It’s a record of a place that isn't there anymore.
If you have a quiet evening and a glass of something warm, give it a look. It’s only about an hour long, or even less depending on the version you find.
It’s weirdly peaceful. Just birds, wind, and people who knew how to survive on a rock.

IMDb —
1925
Community
Log in to comment.