DbcultAccessing Vault...
4.1/10
Senior Film Conservator
A definitive 4.1/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. The Apache Kid's Escape remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Only if you have a real soft spot for Poverty Row Westerns or if you are doing a deep dive into early sound films. If you want a fast-paced action movie, you are going to be very bored. 🌵
Who would enjoy it? People who like seeing Starlight the Horse do more acting than some of the humans. People who find the crackle of old film audio soothing.
Who will hate it? Anyone who expects a plot that makes complete sense or high production values. It feels like it was filmed in a backyard with about fifty dollars. 🐎
Jack Perrin has this look like he is constantly trying to remember if he left the stove on back at the ranch. He plays the Apache Kid with a lot of stiffness, which was pretty common back then.
It is funny how he is supposed to be this dangerous outlaw, but he looks like the most polite guy in the room. He spends a lot of time just sitting on his horse, looking at the horizon.
The movie is called The Apache Kid's Escape, but he doesn't seem to be in that much of a hurry to go anywhere. He just sort of wanders into the plot.
I noticed in one scene his hat is tilted perfectly, and even after a fight, it barely moves. That is some serious hat discipline right there. 🤠
Starlight the Horse gets a billing in the credits, and honestly, he deserves it. There are moments where the camera just stays on the horse while the humans are talking off-screen.
The horse seems more alert than most of the supporting cast. I think there was a scene where Starlight actually looked at the camera like he was checking if the director was still awake.
If you have seen Bucking Broadway, you know how important horses were to these early Western vibes. But here, the horse feels like a coworker, not just a prop.
Being an early talkie, the sound is... rough. You can hear the background noise of the wind more clearly than the actual dialogue sometimes.
There are these long pauses where nobody says anything. It’s not a dramatic silence; it’s more like they were waiting for the guy with the microphone to move closer.
One reaction shot of Fred Church goes on for about five seconds too long. He just stares. It becomes funny if you look at it too closely.
The dialogue is very simple. "He went that way" and "We gotta catch him" make up about 40% of the script.
It reminds me of the slow pacing in Shadows of Suspicion, where everything feels a bit trapped in time. Everything is a bit clunky.
The Kid helps out this cowboy who is in a jam. It is a very noble thing to do for an outlaw.
The whole "escape" part of the movie feels very low stakes. The lawmen chasing him don't seem particularly good at their jobs.
They ride around a lot of the same hills. I am pretty sure I saw the same rock formation three times in ten minutes.
Robert J. Horner, the writer/director, wasn't known for being a perfectionist. You can really tell.
It’s not as grand as something like The Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. It feels much smaller and more disposable.
I fell asleep for about two minutes in the middle and I don't think I missed a single plot point. That says a lot about the depth of the story.
But there is something charming about how bad it is. It’s a relic.
The movie doesn't try to be anything other than a 50-minute distraction for people in 1930. It succeeds at that, I guess.
I liked the way the dust kicked up during the chase scenes. It felt very real and unpolished.
If you want to see what a "B-Western" really looked like before they got all shiny and musical, give it a look. Just don't expect to be moved to tears or anything.
It’s just a guy, a horse, and some bad audio. Sometimes that is enough for a Sunday afternoon. ☁️
I'm still thinking about that horse. Starlight really carried the whole production on his back, literally.
Anyway, it’s short. If you hate it, you only lost an hour of your life.
IMDb —
1921
Community
Log in to comment.
