DbcultAccessing Vault...
Cult Review
Archivist John
Senior Editor
In the flickering penumbra of early celluloid, The Master of the House arrives like a moth-eaten letter pressed between the pages of someone else’s Bible—its seal broken, its perfume turned to dust. Julius Steger’s 1919 chamber melodrama, exhumed now under a crisp 4K glow, charts the erosion of a bourgeois marriage with the implacable patience of a leaking roof. What begins as a sigh of tedium ends as a howl of contrition, and the film’s very title grows feral in the mouth: who, indeed, is master when the architecture of affection rots from within?
Charles Hutchison’s patriarch—never named beyond “the husband”—enters frame already half-ghost, his starched collar a corona of respectability that chafes more than it dignifies. Across the breakfast table Gertrude Shelby’s wife performs the ritual of marital amnesia: she butters bread, she pours tea, she folds linen like a priestess shrouding relics. The camera, timid yet voyeuristic, watches from hallway corners, as though embarrassed to intrude on the slow suffocation of love. Their three children dart through these tableaux like punctuation marks—exclamations that interrupt sentences grown too long.
Enter Margot Williams’s governess, a flapper avant la lettre whose cloche hat tilts like a dare. She speaks of rooftop gardens where saxophones bleed into the dawn, of dance marathons that outrun calendars, of a metropolis where senility is banned and even grandmothers rouge their knees. The husband’s pupils dilate as if someone had pried the blinds of a musty study; urbane mirages bloom in the desert of his middle age. Steger’s intertitles, once terse as telegrams, now unfurl like silk: “In the city one may remain young even at four-score years.” The line, delivered in close-up, detonates a thousand domestic time-bombs.
Cinematographer Austin Webb abandons the static proscenium of prior reels; the lens glides, restless, tracking the governess’s hem as she descends the grand staircase—a secular Annunciation. Light ricochets off the oak banister, carving gilt parentheses around the husband’s awakening lust. Compared to the bucolic fatalism of Niobe or the Expressionist hysteria of Voodoo Vengeance, this seduction feels shockingly quotidian, all the more venomous for its civility.
And so the husband packs his grievances into a crocodile valise, informs his wife that she is “old-fashioned and settled,” and decamps for the city with the governess whose laughter, once crystalline, now acquires the metallic tinkle of loose change. The abandoned wife stands sentinel on the porch, her silhouette a Giotto Madonna stripped of radiant halo, while the children’s shadows knot around her ankles like anchor ropes. The iris-in is merciless: a black diaphragm swallowing hearth, history, hope.
What follows is a montage of metropolitan predation worthy of a Bunyanesque allegory, though Steger prefers Balzacian detail. The governess’s kin emerge from tenement gloom—siblings, cousins, aunts with appetites as sharp as their cheekbones. They colonise the husband’s purse, his townhouse, his arteries. A single intertitle, acid-etched, confesses: “Her family were parasites who lived on him.” Hutchison’s frame deflates; the once-erect patriarch now stoops like a coat hanger deprived of its coat.
At the nadir he discovers the governess dancing a tango with a boulevardier whose silk gloves shine like second skins. The music on the soundtrack—added in the 2022 restoration—swoons into a queasy tango, and for the first time the husband perceives the crepe of his own complexion, the tremor in his once-authoritative hands. In a scene that anticipates Bergman’s mirror-shots by four decades, Steger places two looking-glasses opposite each other so that the husband’s reflection multiplies into infinity, each iteration wearier than the last, a mise-en-abyme of masculine failure.
The eruption is swift: a slap that detonates like a starter pistol, the governess crumpling onto a zebra-striped rug, her lip beading rubies. But the violence is less misogynist spectacle than existential capitulation; it is the moment when patriarchy, drunk on its own myth, topples into self-disgust. He flees, overcoat flapping like a broken wing, into a city that now yawns indifferently—the electric lights no longer promise perpetual youth but rather a fluorescent autopsy.
The final reel unspools like frost across windowpanes. The husband re-enters his former domain hat in hand, beard unshorn, eyes excavated of hubris. Shelby’s wife—still cloaked in mourning weeds—does not rush to forgive; instead she offers him bread and salt, the ancient Slavic rite of reconciliation, her silence more eloquent than any intertitle. The children peek from behind her skirts, half-curious, half-afraid. The camera retreats to an omniscient corner, as if to grant the couple the privacy the medium has forever stolen from them.
Steger resists the temptation of a climactic kiss; instead he frames the couple seated at opposite ends of the long dining table, the chasm between them gradually shortening as the scene fades—a visual ellipsis suggesting that reconciliation is not a door but a corridor. Compared to the punitive endings of When It Strikes Home or the fatalistic determinism of Ingeborg Holm, this denouement feels almost radical in its measured hope.
Charles Hutchison, known to serial-thriller aficionados as a stunt-happy daredevil, here suppresses his athletic vim to expose a psychic flabbiness that is both repellent and pitiable. Watch how he fingers the brim of his top-hat, turning the gesture into a metronome of indecision. Opposite him, Gertrude Shelby eschews melodramatic collapse; her stoicism is carved from the same oak as the family pews, yet a single tear—allowed to linger on cheekbone—gleams like a bead of mercury. Margot Williams’s governess is less femme fatale than entrepreneur of optimism, her seductive power residing not in vampish excess but in the credible utopia she peddles.
Austin Webb’s photography oscillates between chiaroscuro interiors—where shadows pool like spilt port—and nocturnal exteriors awash in a sodium glow that anticipates 1940s film noir. Note the sequence where the husband first beholds the city: a superimposed montage of revolving doors, elevated trains, and revolving electric signs spelling YOUTH in looping cursive. The effect is less travelogue than opium dream, a visual correlative for the narcotic allure of modernity.
Contrast this with the austere palette of the marital homestead: walnut wainscot, lace doilies, hearth embers that throb like cardiac monitors. The chromatic dichotomy enacts a moral dialectic: the warm tungsten of duty versus the cold neon of desire. Even the intertitles participate—those set in the country sport serif typeface redolent of family Bibles, while urban intertitles flare up in Art Deco sans-serif, a typographic striptease.
The 2022 restoration commissioned a score from experimental duo Static & Whirl, who deploy prepared piano, musical saw, and slowed-down heartbeats. During the husband’s metropolitan debauch, the tempo syncopates with the flicker of electric signs; upon his return, a single cello sustains a low C for 90 seconds—an aural bruise. Viewers weaned on the jaunty ragtime accompaniments of The Patchwork Girl of Oz may find the approach austere, yet it honours the film’s ethical chill.
Steger’s screenplay—adapted from Edgar James’s stage play—poses a question still urgent in our Botox era: why does the husband dread ageing only when seen through the eyes of a younger woman? The governess’s city is a Neverland where menopause is banished yet paternal authority remains intact; it is patriarchy’s fondest fantasy, a capitalist Fountain of Youth that needs female flesh as currency. When the husband realises he has paid not for love but for embalming, the film indicts not the governess but the market that conscripts her.
Curiously, the wife is denied similar interiority; we never witness her loneliness in close-up, only the geometry of her absence—an unmended sock, a cooling teacup. This elision may frustrate modern viewers, yet it mirrors the era’s domestic ideology: the wife is the still centre, the negative space that gives the husband’s odyssey outline. In that silence, Shelby conjures a dignity that outshines his entire quest.
Where The Tiger externalises marital discord into crime melodrama, and Dionysus’ Anger mythologises male mid-life crisis as Greek tragedy, The Master of the House keeps its scale human, its moral register quotidian. Its nearest kin may be An American Gentleman, yet whereas that film punishes the adulterer with public ruin, Steger opts for the quieter retribution of self-knowledge.
Long presumed lost, a nitrate print surfaced in a Slovenian monastery in 2019; the current restoration circulates via Kino Lorber’s “Silent Divas” boxset and streams on Criterion Channel under the title slug the-master-of-the-house. Scholars cite it as a proto-feminist indictment of the “city woman” trope; TikTok cinephiles meme the husband’s tear-stained return set to Lana Del Rey. Both camps attest to its uncanny afterlife.
As I closed my laptop at 2 a.m., the final image lingered: a rocking chair swaying without occupant, impelled perhaps by draft or by the residue of some unseen body. It rocks still, in the mind’s peripheral vision, reminding me that homes are not edifices but habits, and that to master a house one must first master the vertigo of one’s own longing.
IMDb 4.3
1919
Community
Log in to comment.
