4.2/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 4.2/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Usinatlo remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Usinatlo isn't really for everyone, let's be straight. If you're hoping for big action or a twisty plot, you'll probably just get bored here. But if you're into quiet, slow-burn stories about how people really live, especially in places you don't see much on screen, then you might find something quite special. 👍
The movie just drops you into the life of the Svans, no big introduction. You just *watch* Siko Palavandishvili's character, maybe he's a farmer, doing his daily rounds. It feels very much like peeking through a window.
There's this one shot, it must be five minutes long, of a woman just stirring a pot over a fire. Nothing happens. But you feel the warmth, the smell almost, and the weight of that routine. It’s oddly mesmerizing.
Elena Senicheva-Esakya has this way of looking at things, a real tiredness in her eyes sometimes. It really gets to you. You see the years there.
The dialogue is sparse, often just short exchanges about chores or the weather. Then there's a moment when someone says something really simple, but it hits hard because of all the quiet leading up to it. Like, a simple 'it will rain soon' can feel like a big statement.
I kept noticing the hands of the people. So much work, you can see it etched right there. That felt very real, very unvarnished.
The landscape itself almost feels like another character, all those sharp mountains and the way the clouds hang low. It’s beautiful, but also kinda unforgiving, you know? Like, a real constant presence.
There's a scene with a small argument about... I think it was about a fence needing repair. It escalates a little, then just kind of fades. No big resolution, just life moving on. 🤷♀️
Arkadi Khintibidze's role is pretty small, but he has this one stare that lasts maybe too long. You're left wondering what he's thinking, what he's seen. There's a whole story in that look.
It's not really about a story with a beginning, middle, and end. It's more about a feeling, a mood. Like you're just visiting for a few hours. A very long visit.
You can almost feel the chill in the air, even on screen. The wind sounds are very present. Very much so. It’s kind of immersive that way.
The film just lets moments breathe, sometimes to the point where you shift in your seat. But then something small happens, a bird flies by, and you're pulled back in. It trusts you to find the meaning.
There’s a real lack of fanfare about anything. Things just *are*. No dramatic music swells. Just the sound of living.
I remember thinking, 'Is this going anywhere?' And then realizing, it already *is* somewhere. It's just being. That's the whole point, I guess.
Aleksandre Jaliashvili, in his short appearances, gives off this very sturdy vibe. Like a rock in that landscape. A quiet strength.
The way they share meals, it’s not loud. It's respectful, almost ritualistic. You pick up on those small patterns. It’s all very deliberate.
This film definitely makes you think about what 'drama' even means. Sometimes it’s just the slow passage of time. And the little things that happen inside it.
It's a quiet film. A really quiet film. You need to be ready for that. Bring your patience. ☕

IMDb —
1917
Community
Log in to comment.