Cult Review
Archivist John
Senior Editor

Alright, so “Wild West Romance.” Is it worth digging up today? Look, if you’re a die-hard fan of old, old Westerns – like, the kind where horses do most of the acting – then maybe, just maybe. For everyone else, especially if you’re used to anything remotely modern, you’ll probably be checking your watch within the first twenty minutes. This one’s for the purists, the folks who love seeing how it all started, warts and all. 🤠
The film drops us right into a little town that looks like it was built yesterday and is already falling apart. It’s got that classic dusty, sun-baked vibe, and you can almost feel the grit in your teeth. Bobby Newman’s character, some kind of rugged rancher I think, spends a lot of time squinting into the distance. It’s a good squint, don’t get me wrong, very effective for a man of the West.
Caryl Lincoln, she shows up in town with a suitcase and a whole lot of gumption. Her character is supposed to be the refined city gal, but she’s got a surprisingly sharp tongue. There’s this one scene where she tells off a rough-looking cowboy, and the way he just *stares* at her, totally flummoxed, is genuinely funny. It felt very natural, like he’d never heard a woman talk back before.
The whole romance angle is a bit… abrupt. One minute they’re practically spitting at each other, the next, Bobby Newman is giving her a look that says, “I might just marry you.” It’s a classic trope, but here it just sort of *happens*. Like, a quick cut and suddenly they’re almost holding hands.
You’ve got your standard bad guy in the mix, too. Rex Bell plays a sneering type who wants something, probably land or the railroad or maybe Caryl Lincoln herself. His villainy is pretty straightforward, lots of glaring and a few too many dramatic hat-tilts. He does ride a very impressive black horse, though.
There’s a horse chase, naturally. Several, actually. They’re shot okay for the time, a lot of galloping and dust clouds. But there’s this one part, maybe two-thirds of the way through, where the same shot of horses running through a very specific cluster of rocks gets used *three times*. Back to back! It pulls you right out of the moment. You can practically hear the editor saying, “Ah, good enough.”
Al Baffert, I think he’s Bobby Newman’s sidekick, adds some much-needed comic relief. He’s always tripping over things or saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. There’s a scene where he tries to milk a cow and the cow just stares at him, utterly unimpressed. It goes on about 10 seconds too long, which somehow makes it funnier. It’s a little moment that sticks with you.
The dialogue is pretty sparse. A lot of meaningful glances and grunts. When someone does talk, it’s usually straight to the point, or some kind of declaration about justice. Or love. Very little in-between stuff. The movie just kinda rolls along, sometimes fast, sometimes just meandering a bit while characters look thoughtful.
One thing that felt a little off was the saloon brawl. Everyone is punching and throwing chairs, but no one ever seems to actually get hurt. One guy gets hit with a bottle and just shakes his head, then gets back into the fray. It’s all very theatrical. Like a stage play, you know? It’s not Phantom Justice levels of serious, that’s for sure.
Fred Parker has a small role as the town sheriff, and he mostly just looks tired. I get it, dealing with all these cowboys must be exhausting. He has this one line, “Another day, another dusty trouble,” that he mutters under his breath, and it felt like the most honest thing in the whole movie.
The ending is a bit rushed, tying everything up with a bow that feels just a little too neat. After all the squinting and the horse-related drama, it just… ends. But hey, it’s a romance, so you know how it’s gonna go. It’s not trying to be A Scandal in Bohemia, or anything complex like that.
So, is “Wild West Romance” a masterpiece? Absolutely not. Is it a charming, if slightly clunky, relic that offers a peek into early Western filmmaking? Yeah, it is. For those with a soft spot for the genre’s beginnings, it’s worth a watch, even if you’re laughing *at* it as much as *with* it. It’s got heart, even if that heart is a bit dusty. ❤️

IMDb —
1917
Community
Log in to comment.