5.8/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.8/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Zhizn v rukakh remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you like old movies that feel like they were dug up from a basement, then yes. You should watch it if you enjoy seeing how people acted before they had microphones to hide behind.
If you hate slow scenes and black-and-white grain, you will probably be bored out of your mind. It is not exactly a popcorn movie.
I found a copy of Zhizn v rukakh and my first thought was just how heavy everything feels. The air in the rooms looks thick.
Boris Ferdinandov has this face that just works for silent film. He doesn't have to say anything, he just looks at the camera and you feel slightly uncomfortable.
There is a scene early on where a character is just sitting by a table. The lighting is very harsh, making half his face look like a shadow.
It reminded me a bit of the lighting styles you see in The Gray Mask. Very dramatic for no reason.
Ivan Malikov-Elvorti shows up and he plays it so big. Like, every hand gesture is a whole event.
I think modern actors could learn something from how much these people used their shoulders to express sadness. Or maybe it is just too much.
The writing by David Maryan is... well, it is hard to tell with just title cards. But the pacing is surprisingly okay for something this old.
It isn't as fun or bouncy as something like One Week. It is much more serious about itself.
There is this one shot of a window that lingers for about ten seconds too long. I kept waiting for someone to walk past, but nobody did.
It is those quiet moments that make the movie feel real. Even if the "quiet" is just the sound of the projector in my head.
Anya Fisher has a few scenes where she looks genuinely worried. Not movie-worried, but like she actually lost her keys and can't find them.
The sets are pretty basic. It looks like they just used whatever buildings were standing nearby at the time.
I noticed a smudge on the lens in one of the outdoor shots. It stayed there for three minutes and I couldn't stop looking at it. 📸
It makes the whole thing feel more human. It wasn't scrubbed clean by a computer.
Some of the plot points feel a bit rushed near the end. One minute they are talking, the next minute everything is falling apart.
It has that same sudden energy you find in A Life for a Life. Just total melodrama from start to finish.
I wouldn't say this is a masterpiece that everyone needs to see. It is more like a time capsule.
You watch it to see how they used to tell stories with just eyes and hands. And maybe a few very long pauses.
The ending doesn't really wrap up in a clean way. It just kind of... stops.
I sat there for a second wondering if the file had cut off early. But no, that was just the style back then.
It’s a bit like The Street of Illusion in that way. It leaves you hanging a bit.
If you're looking for something to watch on a rainy Tuesday, this is a decent choice. Just make sure you're in the mood for some serious staring.
Overall, it is a weird little piece of history. I’m glad I watched it, but I probably won't watch it again for a few years.

IMDb —
1918
Community
Log in to comment.