A reporter sets out to provide how unreliable circumstantial evidence is by faking a murder and then taking the rap for it. However, the "fake" murder victim turns out to be really dead.
Is this thing worth your afternoon? If you like movies where a guy thinks he is the smartest person in the room only to have the universe laugh in his face, you will enjoy this. It is a quick watch, clocking in at a length that does not overstay its welcome. But if you get annoyed by characters who make the dumbest pos...
Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.
Charles Lamont
William Parke
Community
Log in to comment.
"Is this thing worth your afternoon? If you like movies where a guy thinks he is the smartest person in the room only to have the universe laugh in his face, you will enjoy this. It is a quick watch, clocking in at a length that does not overstay its welcome. But if you get annoyed by characters who make the dumbest possible choices to keep the plot moving, you are probably going to want to turn it off after twenty minutes. The premise is essentially the classic 'reporter tries to prove a point'..."
Ewart Adamson, Tom Terriss
United States
Deep dive into the cult classic
Discover similar cinematic experiences
A Directorial Spotlight on Charles Lamont
