

The first time we see Roberto Burat he is tuning his violin with the same languid cruelty a lover might tighten a garrote, and you instantly sense that every note will cost someone a heartbeat. Director-editor Jules Clarétie—yes, the same ink-stained provocateur who once scripted the scandalous A Spy for a Day—has re...


Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.

Eleuterio Rodolfi

Eleuterio Rodolfi
Community
Log in to comment.
" The first time we see Roberto Burat he is tuning his violin with the same languid cruelty a lover might tighten a garrote, and you instantly sense that every note will cost someone a heartbeat. Director-editor Jules Clarétie—yes, the same ink-stained provocateur who once scripted the scandalous A Spy for a Day—has returned with a film that feels less like a narrative and more like a fever etched on celluloid. Shot on grain-rich 35 mm, then solar-bleached to mimic daguerreotype rot, the picture..."

