
Short answer: yes, but only as a historical fossil. If you are looking for a cohesive narrative or modern polish, you will be disappointed, but for those who find beauty in the primitive scratches of early celluloid, it is essential viewing.This film is for the animation historian and the lover of vaudevillian slapstic...

still_frame
Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.

Charles R. Bowers

Henry Edwards
Community
Log in to comment.
"Short answer: yes, but only as a historical fossil. If you are looking for a cohesive narrative or modern polish, you will be disappointed, but for those who find beauty in the primitive scratches of early celluloid, it is essential viewing.This film is for the animation historian and the lover of vaudevillian slapstick; it is absolutely not for anyone who requires high-fidelity visuals or a sensitivity to modern cultural depictions.The Verdict at a Glance1) This film works because it captures t..."


Deep dive into the cult classic
Discover similar cinematic experiences
A Directorial Spotlight on Charles R. Bowers