5.5/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.5/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Fifty Miles from Broadway remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Alright, so 'Fifty Miles from Broadway.' Is it worth digging up today? Honestly, probably not for most folks. If you’re a **die-hard silent film enthusiast** who enjoys picking apart every little period detail, sure, give it a shot. Everyone else? You’ll likely find it a bit of a slog, a curiosity more than a captivating watch. 🕰️
The premise is simple enough. Olga Woods plays this dancer from Broadway, and her sweetheart, Reginald Merville, tags along. They go back to her small town, and boom, their dads are fighting. A big, ol' family feud, right?
But the 'feud' itself is… understated. You expect some dramatic shouting, maybe a thrown punch, but it’s more like two stubborn old men making faces at each other over a fence. Harry Watson, as one of the fathers, just has this permanent scowl that almost becomes funny after a while. Josephine Fontaine, the other dad, well, he mostly just looks confused, which isn't exactly 'fiery antagonism.' 🔥
The film opens with a glimpse of the 'Broadway life.' It's not exactly dazzling. The stage scenes feel a bit cramped, like they were shot in a spare room rather than a grand theater. Olga Woods does her best to convey star power, but the camera kind of keeps its distance, which doesn't help. You can almost feel the movie trying to convince you this big city life matters, but the conviction isn't quite there.
Then they take the train. The transition from the supposed hustle of New York to the quiet countryside is jarring. There’s a scene where they arrive at the station, and it’s just them, a porter, and one very bored-looking dog. No big welcome party, no bustling small town feel. It makes you wonder how small this town really is. 🐶
Once they’re home, the real 'action' starts, which mostly involves the young couple trying to patch things up between their dads. Reginald Merville, playing the boyfriend, spends a lot of time looking earnest. His earnestness is a little *too* constant. Every time he tries to mediate, he has this wide-eyed, slightly worried expression that never really changes. It’s like he has one emotional setting.
There's this one moment where one of the fathers, I think it was Watson, refuses to sit at the same dinner table. He just stands by the wall, arms crossed, glaring at his plate. The scene goes on about 20 seconds too long, and the silence starts to feel awkward rather than emotional. You almost expect someone to just walk over and drag him to the table. 😂
The title cards, bless their hearts, are very wordy. Sometimes, they just recap what just happened, which is a bit redundant. It’s like the film doesn't quite trust you to follow along, even with all the exaggerated gestures.
What struck me was how much time is spent on the two lead actors just… walking around. They walk through fields, they walk to the fathers' houses, they walk back again. It really stretches things out. Not quite the grand adventure of The Eagle, you know? It’s charming in its own, slow way, but you need patience. Like, a lot of it.
The resolution of the feud itself is pretty sudden. One minute, they're not talking, the next, a small incident happens, and suddenly, they're hugging. It feels a bit unearned. Like the writers, Douglas Leavitt, just needed to wrap it up because the film was running out of reel.
Overall, 'Fifty Miles from Broadway' is a curious peek into early filmmaking. It's not a must-see, unless you're specifically studying early cinema or you're already through the entire library of classic Buster Keaton and need something else. It's got its moments, but they're mostly moments of quiet observation rather than gripping drama. Just don't expect a thrilling ride. It's more of a gentle stroll through a bygone era.

IMDb 4.8
1915
Community
Log in to comment.