6.4/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.4/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Gore i radost zhenshchiny remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Alright, so 'Gore i radost zhenshchiny' — 'The Grief and Joy of a Woman' — it's not exactly a casual Tuesday night watch. If you're into silent films, especially those with a really heavy, almost *physical* emotional core, then yeah, this one’s absolutely worth seeking out. It's a tough sit, no doubt. But for anyone expecting quick cuts or neat resolutions, or just, you know, dialogue, you’re probably going to find it a bit much. It asks for your patience, and then some.
The story, such as it is, follows a woman through a series of trials. It's less about specific events and more about the *feeling* of living through them. You see her face, a lot of it, and the camera just drinks it in. There's this one long shot, early on, where she’s just staring out a window, and the light hits her eyes in a way that just *sells* the quiet despair. It’s effective, but also, _man_, it really sets the tone.
The performances, too. You can feel the weight of them. Seeing names like Sergei Eisenstein and Grigoriy Aleksandrov in the cast list for a film like this, it’s kinda neat. They're not doing grand speeches, obviously, but there’s a real intensity to their presence, even in the background. Eduard Tisse’s influence, if he was behind the camera, you can definitely feel it in how certain scenes are framed. The way a shadow falls on a character's face, or the sharp contrast between light and dark, it’s all very deliberate.
There's a scene in a market, a really chaotic one, where the camera just sort of pushes through the crowd. It feels surprisingly modern, almost like a handheld shot, even though it’s obviously not. You get these flashes of other people's lives, fleeting expressions, a child reaching for something. It’s a powerful moment of her being lost in the noise, but also finding a weird connection in the anonymity. But then it cuts to a close-up of her hand clutching a small, worn charm, and you remember she's utterly alone in her struggle. That contrast, it hits you.
Sometimes, the film goes on about 10 seconds too long on a reaction shot. It’s like the director really wants you to *feel* every ounce of whatever emotion is happening. Most of the time, it works. Other times, you start to feel a little antsy, wondering when we’re going to move on. But that’s kinda part of its charm, or maybe its challenge. It’s not trying to rush you.
And the intertitles! Some of them are just brutal. Really simple, stark statements about fate or injustice. Not flowery at all. There's one that just says, 'The world moved on. She did not.' And it just sits there for a beat longer than you expect. It's very impactful. Another one, 'Joy, a whisper,' right before a scene that is barely joyful at all, just a brief, *brief* smile that vanishes.
The 'joy' part of the title? It’s hard-won. Very, very hard-won. You see it in tiny bursts. A small act of kindness from a stranger, a moment of quiet peace, but it’s always fleeting. The film never lets you get too comfortable. It always pulls you back to the struggle. It kinda reminded me of The Valley of the Moon in its earnest look at human hardship, but this one feels more... raw.
It’s not perfect, though. There are moments where the acting style, typical of the era, can feel a little over-the-top if you’re not used to it. The gestures, the wide eyes, it can be a bit much for modern sensibilities. But then you remember the context, the need to convey everything without words, and you kinda forgive it.
By the end, you're not left with a neat package. It's more of a feeling, an impression. Like you just walked through something heavy and meaningful, but you're still processing it. It's a film that asks you to *experience* it, not just watch it. And for that, it’s pretty cool. 🎬

IMDb —
1917
Community
Log in to comment.