5.7/10
Archivist John
Senior Editor

A definitive 5.7/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. His Destiny remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you have about an hour and you really like looking at old black-and-white rocks, His Destiny is probably worth a look. It is for the person who likes the quiet, empty feeling of 1920s Westerns where the wind seems to blow through the screen. If you need explosions or fast talking, you will absolutely hate this one. 🌵
It is basically Neal Hart doing his thing, looking very serious while wearing a hat that looks slightly too big for his head. He plays a man named Neal (creative, right?) who is trying to outrun some bad luck. He ends up in a place where people are suspicious of him, which is the standard setup for about half of these movies from back then.
The print I saw was a bit grainy, but you can still see the intensity in his eyes. There is this one scene where he is just staring at a campfire for what feels like three minutes. I kept waiting for something to happen, but he just keeps staring. It is kind of mesmerizing in a way that modern movies are too scared to be.
Neal Hart was always a bit more rugged than the flashy stars of the time. He does not do the big, theatrical gestures you see in something like The Man in the Iron Mask. He just sits there. He is very good at sitting.
Mary Cross plays the love interest, and she has these incredibly wide eyes that make her look constantly surprised. Every time she looks at Neal, she looks like she just saw a ghost. Or maybe she was just surprised by his mustache. It is a very substantial mustache.
There is a guy named Joe Quinn in this too, playing a character that is supposed to be threatening. But he has this way of walking that makes him look like he is trying not to step on any ants. It is hard to be scared of a villain who walks like he is in a library. 📚
I noticed that the horses in this movie look genuinely tired. Usually, movie horses are all perky and ready to run, but these ones look like they have been working a double shift. It adds a bit of realism that I actually liked. It feels dusty and uncomfortable.
The plot gets a bit tangled when they try to introduce a backstory about a family inheritance or something. I honestly tuned out during those title cards. They were way too long and had too many words. Just let me see the guy ride the tired horse again.
At one point, there is a fight scene that is edited so strangely. One guy throws a punch, and then it cuts to a completely different angle where the other guy is already on the ground. It is like they forgot to film the part where the fist actually hits the face. It made me laugh out loud, which probably was not the goal.
The landscape is the real star, though. They shot this in some very pretty locations that probably have condos on them now. There is a shot of a valley that looks just like the one in Outlaws of Red River, but maybe I am just imagining that. All these old Western valleys start to look the same after a while.
I kept thinking about The Lightning Rider while watching this. That movie had a lot more energy. His Destiny is more of a slow burn, or maybe just a slow smolder that never quite catches fire. It is peaceful, in a weird way.
There is a scene near the end where Neal has to make a choice, and the lighting is actually really good. They used the natural sun to create these long shadows that look very dramatic. It is the one moment where the movie feels like it was directed by someone who really cared about the art part of it.
Barbara Kent shows up briefly, and she is always a delight to see. She has a way of making even the boring scenes feel a bit more alive. I wish she was in it more, honestly. The movie gets a bit heavy when it is just the men grunting at each other through title cards.
The pacing is definitely an issue. It feels longer than it is. I found myself checking my phone a couple of times during the middle section where they are just talking in a cabin. But then Neal would do something cool with a rope and I would be back in. 🤠
It reminds me a bit of Bring Him In in how it handles the whole 'stranger in town' trope. But Neal Hart is a much different presence than the guys in that film. He feels more like a real person you might meet at a hardware store who just happens to be in a movie.
Is it a masterpiece? No. Is it better than The Brand of Satan? Yeah, probably. It does not try to be anything it is not. It is just a story about a guy and his destiny, which turns out to be a lot of walking and some light frowning.
I liked the dog. There is a dog in one scene that looks very confused by the camera. He keeps looking off to the side, probably at the guy holding a piece of meat. Those are the little things that make these old silents fun to watch. You see the real world peeking through the edges of the fiction. 🐶
If you are looking for something to put on while you fold laundry, this is a good choice. It is rhythmic and predictable, but not in a bad way. It is like a comfort food movie for people who like the smell of old paper and leather saddles. I do not think I will ever watch it again, but I am glad I saw it once. It has a soul, even if that soul is a bit sleepy.
One thing that really stuck with me was the way they used the tinting in the night scenes. It is that deep blue color that looks nothing like actual night but feels exactly like movie night. It made the whole ending feel like a dream. Or maybe I was just starting to nod off. Either way, it was pretty.

IMDb —
1918
Community
Log in to comment.